UNFAIR FRANCHISOR CONDUCT

Unfair franchisor and supplier conduct in the franchise world is multi-faceted, and refers to many different schemes, policies and formats. Based on franchisee lawyer Jeff Goldstein’s over three decades of complex litigation on behalf of franchisees and dealers, he has identified three general areas of unfair franchisor conduct, each of which will be explored and discussed at length in the sub-tabs under this substantive section holder.

First, Unfair Franchisor Conduct includes wrongful and unfair supplier unfair competition, whereby Franchisees and dealers complain frequently that their franchisors, suppliers or manufacturers have injured them by engaging in unfair competition or unfair practices. In making these complaints, franchisees and dealers almost always describe the allegedly wrongful conduct by franchisors and suppliers as unfair competition. The layman’s use of this term is far more encompassing than it is under relevant trade practice laws and statutes. Unlike the antitrust laws, which have readily identifiable and specific elements of prototypical transgressions, the substance of unfair competition and unfair acts and practices laws differs significantly across states and jurisdictions.

Second, Unfair Franchisor Conduct includes wrongful franchisor tying and supply restrictions, whereby Franchisees and dealers consistently but understandably complain about supply and source restrictions imposed on them by their franchisors, including unlawful antitrust tying claims. Manufacturers and franchisors publicly justify the imposition and enforcement of source controls as necessary to maintain system quality standards. Suppliers and franchisors also argue that such source controls maintain necessary uniformity and make franchisees more efficient and successful. In addition, of course, some franchise and distribution systems must use restricted supply sources to protect their commercial secrets, such as recipes, for instance.

Third, Unfair Franchisor Conduct includes wrongful antitrust violations by franchisors and suppliers, whereby Franchisees and dealers are systematically subjected to new and obtrusive marketing and pricing demands made by franchisors and suppliers that seem at first blush to violate the antitrust laws. The general purpose of most antitrust laws, both at the federal and state levels, is to preserve and promote competition in relevant markets. Many times, however, modern conceptions of competition, which focus on increased aggregate consumer welfare in the economy as a whole, are inconsistent with notions of the well-bring of individual competitors, which focus or the financial stability and longevity of individual franchisees and dealers.

Lawyer USA

Super Lawyers

Lawyer USA

Complex Commercial Litigation Law Firm of the Year – USA

Lawyer USA

Complex Commercial Distribution Litigation Representative

Lawyer USA

Antitrust & Franchise Law Firm of the Year – Washington DC

Lawyer USA

Best Franchise Lawyer of the Year – New York

Lawyer USA

Best for Franchise Disputes – USA

Lawyer USA

Complex Commercial Litigation Law (Franchisees and Dealers) 2021 – USA

Lawyer USA

Antitrust and Franchise Law Firm of the Year in DC

Lawyer USA

Leading Professionals in Law

Lawyer USA

Franchise Law
in the District of Columbia

Lawyer USA

Franchise Law Firm
of the Year – USA

Lawyer International

Lawyer International
Legal 100
2018

Lawyer International

Lawyer International
Legal 100
2019

ACQ5 LAW AWARDS 2019

US (New York)
Franchise Lawyer
of the Year
ACQ5 GLOBAL AWARDS 2019, JEFF GOLDSTEIN, GOLDSTEIN LAW FIRM, PLLC

ACQ5 LAW AWARDS 2019

US (New York)
Franchise Law Firm
of the Year
ACQ5 GLOBAL AWARDS 2019, GOLDSTEIN LAW FIRM, PLLC

Lawyers of Distinction logo

2020 Power Lawyers

Esteemed Lawyers of America Logo

Esteemed Law Firm Complex Litigation

Global Law Experts Logo

Recommended Firm in Franchise Litigation

Who's Who Attorney Logo

Top Attorney USA – Litigation

Avvo Franchise Lawyer Symbol

Superior Attorney in Franchising

Avvo Franchise Lawyer Symbol

Superior Attorney in Antitrust

Finance Monthly Global Award Winner Logo

Franchise Law Firm of the Year

Lead Counsel logo

Chosen Law Firm for Commercial Litigation

BBB of Washington DC

A+ Rated

Washington DC Chamber of Commerce

Verified Member

Lawyers of Distinction logo

Franchise Law Firm of the Year

ISSUU

Best Law Firm for Franchise Disputes in 2017

Law Awards Finanace Monthly

Franchise Law Firm of the Year - 2017

Top Franchise Litigator for Franchisees and Dealers

Top Franchise Litigator for Franchisees and Dealers

2017 Finance Monthly Award

2017 Finance Monthly Award

ACQ5 LAW AWARDS 2018

Franchise Law Firm
of the Year
ACQ5 LAW AWARDS 2018

ACQ5 LAW AWARDS 2019

Franchise Law Firm
of the Year
ACQ5 LAW AWARDS 2019

Franchise Law Firm of the Year

Franchise Law Firm of the Year

Franchise Law Firm of the Year

Franchise Law Firm of the Year
Global Awards 2017

Global Law Experts

Franchise Law Firm
of the Year
in New York – 2019

Finance Monthly Law Awards - 2018

Finance Monthly Law Awards - 2018

Franchise Law Firm of the Year

Franchise Law Firm
of the Year
Global Awards 2018

Contact Us

Goldstein Law Firm, PLLC

1629 K St. NW, Suite 300,
Washington, DC 20006

Phone: 202-293-3947
Fax: 202-315-2514

Free Consultation

Downtown Chicago Office

30 South Wacker Drive 22nd Floor #3341,
Chicago, IL 60606

Phone: 312-382-8327

Free Consultation

Free Consultation