Get Legal Assistance from Franchise Lawyers Who Defend the Franchisee
The Goldstein Law Firm is a boutique national law firm that represents exclusively franchisees and dealers, not franchisors, suppliers or manufacturers. There are only a handful of franchisee lawyer specialists remaining in the country, as most have begun representing both franchisors and franchisees.
Franchise law is a multifaceted area of law that requires specialization. Any franchise attorney can tell you about a variety of cases where franchise agreements have gone south.
Here at Goldstein, our attorneys have as much as 30 years of experience handling all aspects of franchise litigation throughout the county.
We also specialize in franchise agreement assistance, bringing you the latest developments in franchise and distribution law. With the publishing of our Franchise Trends newsletter, we can help franchisees stay updated on developments concerning different legal aspects of franchising.
Dealing with the complexities and challenges of franchise law requires focus and specialization, which is why we represent dealers and franchisees exclusively. Unlike other firms, we at Goldstein are on the side of the franchisee. We can help you decipher the fine print of your franchise agreement and single out details your franchisor may not want you to know.
Without a knowledgeable and competent franchise consultant, you may be vulnerable to the pitfalls of franchise law. Simply walking away is not a viable solution if you’re looking to protect your assets and yourself from financially damaging consequences. For those who have already signed an agreement and are struggling with franchisor difficulties, our franchise law firm also provides legal assistance through its franchise attorneys.
Frequently Asked Questions on Franchise Law:
However, there are few if any recent case findings in which a franchisor has violated the terms of a franchise agreement. And if the franchise agreement hasn’t been violated, the courts almost never support a free-standing claim of negligence against the franchisor.
In other words, courts have held that franchisors do not owe a duty of competence to their franchisees.
It’s interesting to note, however, that many franchise law firms stay busy addressing the flip side of this issue–whether the franchisee has acted negligently in operating his or her franchise
However, the provisions outlining those duties owed by franchisors are few and normally too ambiguous to enforce. Most franchise agreements include contractual language stating to the effect that "the franchisor doesn't guarantee the success of the franchisee."
In practice, this means that franchisors really don’t have a compelling duty to provide support to their franchisees.
Also, most franchise agreements require franchisees to state in their agreements that their business venture involves risks, one of the most prominent being the business knowledge of the franchisee.
This results in a double standard: The franchisor has only a few ephemeral obligations to the franchisor. But in contrast, the “whereas” provisions in the introduction of most franchise agreements indicate that the franchisor is the undisputed guru in operating franchises in that particular industry.
Keep in mind, these areas are so broadly defined that even the best trial attorney would have difficulty in trying to identify – never mind proving – the contours of such duties unless he or she had extensive experience within a franchise law firm.
Are franchisors permitted to modify their requirements or system standards during the term of the franchise?
Franchisors gain this fluidity by lacing their franchise agreements with language that "the franchisor is permitted to modify or change the Operations Manual." They can then "incorporate by reference” the Operations Manual into the franchise agreement.
The franchisor's unbridled discretion is further bolstered by language in the franchise agreement that "the franchisor may modify the Operations Manual in its 'sole discretion.'"
Everybody knows that people and businesses are subject to liability for “negligence.” Can't franchisors be held liable for negligence to their franchisees as well?
When the franchisee is only claiming economic loss – which is almost always the case -the franchisee must seek its damages through a breach of contract action.
The franchisee would have to prove that the franchisor violated the franchise agreement. This is very difficult to prove, as the franchisor’s duties are usually few, ephemeral, and deliberately vague.
It’s possible a franchisor could be found liable if he or she failed to work in good faith and with fair dealing, but this is a long shot.
Note, however, that courts have found franchisors liable for negligence in certain
cases where personal injuries were involved.
Read about more frequently asked questions on Franchise Law.
Why The Goldstein Law Firm Is Your Winning Law Firm Choice:
- Over Three Decades of Distribution/Franchise Law Experience
- Specialization In All Franchise-Related Legal Subject Matters
- Experience and Expertise in All Court Systems in the USA
- Widest Geographical Scope of Clients
- Exclusive Client Base – Only Franchisees & Dealers
- Personal Attorney Attention to Your Case
- Large-Firm Training & Experience
- Government Experience
- Active Writing & Research in the Franchise Field – Familiarity with Laws in All States